
How to manage memory procurement risk during global shortages without sacrificing quality or compliance.
The global memory component market continues to face significant disruption. Ongoing supply chain constraints, uneven manufacturing recovery, and sustained demand across industrial, automotive, aerospace, defense, and data-center applications have created a prolonged memory shortage that shows little sign of immediate stabilization.
Availability and pricing remain highly volatile. Memory components that were once easily sourced are now subject to sudden allocation notices, unpredictable lead times, and aggressive price increases. As a result, sourcing new and unused memory has become increasingly difficult and expensive.
Learn More: The Global Memory Chip Shortage: DRAM, DDR4, NAND Flash and HBM Memory
Extended lead times and unexpected pricing shifts are disrupting production schedules, delaying programs, and increasing overall procurement risk.
Key takeaway: In today’s shortage-driven market, waiting exclusively for new memory components is often unrealistic and unsustainable.
Current market conditions are forcing even the most conservative organizations to reassess long-standing “new only” sourcing policies.
Rigid sourcing policies can quickly stall production when new memory is unavailable or allocated.
At the same time, procurement teams are under increasing pressure to:
• Maintain production continuity
• Meet contractual obligations
• Control escalating component costs
These pressures are often compounded by regulatory, contractual, or customer-imposed constraints, making sourcing decisions more complex than ever.
Market reality: Even organizations with historically strict procurement standards are being forced to explore alternative memory sourcing strategies.
As alternative sourcing becomes part of the conversation, it’s important to clearly define common terms.
Refurbished Memory: Components that have been previously used or stored and then professionally processed, tested, and verified to meet defined quality and performance criteria.
Pulled Memory Components: Devices removed from functioning systems, often due to system upgrades, excess inventory recovery, or hardware refresh cycles.
A common misconception is that refurbished memory is inherently unreliable. In reality, quality varies significantly depending on supplier vetting, testing methodology, and traceability controls.
During extended shortages, refurbished memory may become the only viable option to keep systems operational.
Concerns surrounding refurbished or alternative memory sourcing are justified.
Buyers commonly raise issues related to:
• Authenticity and counterfeit risk
• Reliability and electrical performance
• Warranty limitations and traceability gaps
• Quality assurance and regulatory compliance
The real risk is not refurbished memory - it’s poorly vetted suppliers and inadequate testing processes.
When sourced correctly, risk can be mitigated through:
• Independent third-party testing for authenticity, electrical integrity, and functional reliability
• Use of AS6081 and AS6496 accredited test laboratories
• Full documentation and lot-level traceability
Key takeaway: Proper testing, transparency, and supplier discipline dramatically reduce sourcing risk.
While waiting for new memory components may appear to be the lowest-risk option, it often carries significant hidden costs.
These include:
• Inflated pricing during allocation periods
• Opportunity cost from stalled or delayed programs
• Contractual penalties tied to missed delivery milestones
• Production downtime that impacts downstream operations
Learn More: DDR4 and DDR5 Prices Surge
In many cases, controlled alternative sourcing provides a more cost-effective and predictable outcome than indefinite delays.
The “safest” option on paper can become the most expensive choice in practice.
Refurbished memory is not appropriate for every application - but it becomes a strategic solution in specific scenarios.
Including:
• End-of-life (EOL) or allocation-constrained memory components
• Government, defense, and industrial programs are facing supply pressure
• Legacy systems with no form-fit-function replacement
• Short-term bridge solutions while long-term supply stabilizes
In these cases, the objective is continuity, risk management, and program protection.
Microchip USA supports customers navigating volatile memory markets with a focus on risk mitigation, transparency, and long-term reliability.
Our approach includes:
• Deep experience in global memory sourcing during shortage conditions
• Strict supplier qualification and quality control standards
• Clear, transparent communication throughout the procurement process
• A customer-first mindset focused on protecting the end user
We partner with independent AS6081 and AS6496 third-party test lab partners to validate memory authenticity and performance.
Microchip USA is a GIDEP and ECIA member and maintains the following certifications:
• ISO 9001:2015
• ISO 27001:2013
• ISO 14001:2015
• AS9120
Our role is to help you assess sourcing options, mitigate risk, and ensure compliance during supply chain disruptions.
The global memory market is unlikely to normalize overnight. As shortages persist, procurement strategies must evolve to reflect operational realities rather than ideal sourcing conditions.
Working with experienced, transparent partners enables organizations to adapt without sacrificing quality, reliability, or compliance.
If your program is delayed due to memory shortages, working with an experienced sourcing partner can help you evaluate all viable procurement options without unnecessary risk.
Microchip USA’s key advantages:
• Global memory market research and sourcing intelligence
• Risk reduction through AS6081 & AS6496 accredited test lab partners
• A broad inventory network supported by manufacturing partners
In today’s market, flexibility, backed by discipline and transparency, is a true competitive advantage. Contact us today!